- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:59:55 -0400
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Stephan, On Apr 26, 2012, at 12:11 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-367 (hadActivity-domain-and-comments-unclear): prov:hadActivity domain and usage unclear [Ontology] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/367 > > Raised by: Stephan Zednik > On product: Ontology > > 1) There are two domains defined for prov:hadActivity > > - prov:Involvement > - the union of prov:Derivation and prov:Responsibility > > from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_domain > > Where a property P has more than one rdfs:domain property, then the resources denoted by subjects of triples with predicate P are instances of all the classes stated by the rdfs:domain properties. Agreed. Both domains hold for all subjects that use the property. The simpler domain is for RL compatibility, and the union is for RL++ use. They do not contradict. > >> From what I can tell this means the domain is the intersection of prov:Involvement with the union of prov:Derivation and prov:Responsibility, which is just the union of prov:Derivation and prov:Responsibility since both are subclasses of prov:Involvement. Correct. > > > 2) annotations on prov:hadActivity > > - it appears that the domain has been relaxed to be a union of Derivation and Responsibility, so I think we can remove the prov:todo annotation done > > - The rdfs:comment is currently "The activity generating the the derived entity and using the derived-from entity". I think this should be updated to reflect the relaxed domain. What does it mean when a qualified Responsibility hadActivity? > DM says: derivation: activity: an optional identifier (a) for the activity using and generating the above entities; invalidation: activity: an optional identifier for the activity that invalidated the entity; responsibility: activity: an optional identifier (a) of an activity for which the responsibility link holds; PROV-O comment was: The activity generating the derived entity and using the derived-from entity. PROV-O comment changed to: Optional: The Activity that is part of the Involvement, which used, generated, invalidated, or was the responsibility of some Entity. -Tim
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 15:00:32 UTC