- From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 21:30:45 +0200
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 8 April 2012 19:31:14 UTC
Hi all, there are some inverse properties now in the ontology (like generated), but we have avoided to include them as much as we can to keep the model simple. If the creator of this issue is not happy with this resolution, I would like to ask him/her to provide some examples showing the need for the inverse properties, and why the current model is not enough for capturing them. This issue is now pending review, and I propose to close it. Thanks, Daniel 2011/8/25 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> > > ISSUE-83: Express inverse relationships in Provenance Model as well as > ontology > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/83 > > Raised by: > On product: > > > > > >
Received on Sunday, 8 April 2012 19:31:14 UTC