- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:27:26 -0400
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Cc: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Paul, I agree with Khalid that the new OWL-RL focus has eliminated the need to address any "PROV-O and Vanilla RDF" discussions, since they are one in the same. Can you provide specific concerns that remain in this particular ssue? Or please consider closing this and opening a new issue related to your "PROV-O should be easy to SPARQL" point that you've recently raised. Thanks, Tim On Mar 13, 2012, at 4:06 AM, Paul Groth wrote: > Hi Khalid, > > I would prefer to leave this issue open as a check when the next version of the ontology comes out. This is not just about owl-rl but how the whole thing looks in things like sparql. > > I'm sure it will be resolved but I want it as a reminder to check. > > cheers > Paul > > Khalid Belhajjame wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >> Given that we decided to adopt OWL-RL, which is a (subset) profile of >> OWL. Would you be happy if we close this issue? >> >> Thanks, khalid >> >> On 06/10/2011 10:11, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>> PROV-ISSUE-119 (vanilla-rdf): How does vanilla RDF work with PROV Ontology [Formal Model] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/119 >>> >>> Raised by: Paul Groth >>> On product: Formal Model >>> >>> The Provenance Ontology uses OWL for a number of reasons. However, we agreed at the last F2F that it was a good idea for adoption that that OWL be easy to use in "vanilla RDF" or developer friendly RDF. >>> >>> I was wondering if we could either add a section or another document that shows how some examples look in such vanilla rdf. Essentially, what can I do if I don't know anything about reasoning or even class hierarchies. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > -- > Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) > http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ > Assistant Professor > Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group > Artificial Intelligence Section > Department of Computer Science > VU University Amsterdam > > >
Received on Monday, 16 April 2012 13:28:13 UTC