Re: PROV-ISSUE-331 release of prov-dm for review

>Can the document be released as a next public working draft? If no,
>what are the blocking issues?
>Is the structure of the document approved?

Yes and yes.  I found it much easier to follow than previous versions.
I think separating out constraints and notation simplifies the
presentation of the fundamental concepts.

>Can the short name of the document be confirmed (in particular, for
>prov-n, prov-dm-constraints, since request needs to be sent for

They aren't perfect, but I can't think of better ones.  I think they
are fine.

>Can all concept definitions be confirmed? Specifically,
>consider ISSUE-337 on agents

I'm not convinced activities should be able to be agents.  I'd rather
keep the current definition.

>consider ISSUE-223 on entities

I like Simon's proposal "An entity is a physical, digital, conceptual,
or other kind of thing; things may be real or imaginary." better
than the one in the document now.


Received on Monday, 9 April 2012 12:14:14 UTC