- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:01:35 -0400
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/0b0dfa4bfb9b On Apr 26, 2012, at 10:59 AM, Timothy Lebo wrote: > Stephan, > > On Apr 26, 2012, at 12:11 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > >> PROV-ISSUE-367 (hadActivity-domain-and-comments-unclear): prov:hadActivity domain and usage unclear [Ontology] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/367 >> >> Raised by: Stephan Zednik >> On product: Ontology >> >> 1) There are two domains defined for prov:hadActivity >> >> - prov:Involvement >> - the union of prov:Derivation and prov:Responsibility >> >> from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_domain >> >> Where a property P has more than one rdfs:domain property, then the resources denoted by subjects of triples with predicate P are instances of all the classes stated by the rdfs:domain properties. > > Agreed. Both domains hold for all subjects that use the property. > The simpler domain is for RL compatibility, and the union is for RL++ use. > They do not contradict. > >> >>> From what I can tell this means the domain is the intersection of prov:Involvement with the union of prov:Derivation and prov:Responsibility, which is just the union of prov:Derivation and prov:Responsibility since both are subclasses of prov:Involvement. > > Correct. > >> >> >> 2) annotations on prov:hadActivity >> >> - it appears that the domain has been relaxed to be a union of Derivation and Responsibility, so I think we can remove the prov:todo annotation > > done > >> >> - The rdfs:comment is currently "The activity generating the the derived entity and using the derived-from entity". I think this should be updated to reflect the relaxed domain. What does it mean when a qualified Responsibility hadActivity? >> > > DM says: > > derivation: > activity: an optional identifier (a) for the activity using and generating the above entities; > > invalidation: > activity: an optional identifier for the activity that invalidated the entity; > > responsibility: > activity: an optional identifier (a) of an activity for which the responsibility link holds; > > > PROV-O comment was: > > The activity generating the derived entity and using the derived-from entity. > > PROV-O comment changed to: > > Optional: The Activity that is part of the Involvement, which used, generated, invalidated, or was the responsibility of some Entity. > > -Tim >
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 15:02:07 UTC