- From: Cresswell, Stephen <stephen.cresswell@tso.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:27:28 +0100
- To: "Luc Moreau" <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "Provenance Working Group WG" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I preferred the version of specializationOf that was transitive, antisymmetric and reflexive. Stephen Cresswell > -----Original Message----- > From: Luc Moreau [mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk] > Sent: 02 April 2012 11:19 > To: Provenance Working Group WG > Subject: is specializationOf transitive or not? > > > All, > > The purpose of this email is to seek some clarification on what people > think > about the transitive nature of specializationOf. > > James' semantics [1] defines this relation as transitive. > > Do you think specializationOf is transitive? > If not, can you give a counter example? > > Cheers, > Luc > > PS: tracker, this is ISSUE-29 > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/FormalSemanticsWD3 > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive > anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: > http://www.star.net.uk > ________________________________________________________________________ *********************************************************************************************** This email, including any attachment, is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient or if you have received this email in error, please inform the sender immediately by reply and delete all copies from your system. Do not retain, copy, disclose, distribute or otherwise use any of its contents. Whilst we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure that this email has been swept for computer viruses, we cannot guarantee that this email does not contain such material and we therefore advise you to carry out your own virus checks. We do not accept liability for any damage or losses sustained as a result of such material. Please note that incoming and outgoing email communications passing through our IT systems may be monitored and/or intercepted by us solely to determine whether the content is business related and compliant with company standards. *********************************************************************************************** The Stationery Office Limited is registered in England No. 3049649 at 10 Eastbourne Terrace, London, W2 6LG
Received on Monday, 2 April 2012 13:28:03 UTC