Re: PROV-ISSUE-128 (Location-Example): Location example uses a filesystem and not a geographical location [Ontology]

Thank you Paul and Tim,

Eric

On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 4:29 AM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote:
> Sorry for the delayed reply.
>
> ISSUE-128 can be closed.
>
> Thanks
> Paul
>
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
>> Paul,
>>
>> Could you recommend what needs to be done to settle this issue?
>>
>> prov:atLocation is used to reflect the concept in DM:
>>
>> A location can be an identifiable geographic place (ISO 19112), but it can also be a non-geographic place such as a directory, row, or column. As such, there are numerous ways in which location can be expressed, such as by a coordinate, address, landmark, and so forth. This document does not specify how to concretely express locations, but instead provide a mechanism to introduce locations, by means of a reserved attribute.
>>
>> Section 3.3 of the prov-o html uses prov:atLocation for file paths, Madrid, and a blog URL to illustrate this variety of Locations that can be modeled.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 20, 2011, at 5:31 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> PROV-ISSUE-128 (Location-Example): Location example uses a filesystem and not a geographical location [Ontology]
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/128
>>>
>>> Raised by: Paul Groth
>>> On product: Ontology
>>>
>>> I was looking at the definition of Location in the Ontology and the example talks about a file system path. This seems odd given that the general description of the concept is about a geospatial location. Can this be clarified?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
> Assistant Professor
> Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group
> Artificial Intelligence Section
> Department of Computer Science
> VU University Amsterdam
>

Received on Sunday, 29 April 2012 22:45:38 UTC