- From: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:48:49 -0600
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Cc: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <992B98A9-D107-4F71-9F75-C538C5503687@rpi.edu>
It's in the data model. A revision record, written wasRevisionOf(e2,e1,ag,attrs) in PROV-ASN, contains: newer: an identifier e2 identifying an entity that represents a newer version of an entity; older: an identifier e1 identifying an entity that represents an older version of an entity; responsibility: an optional identifier ag for the agent who approved that e2 is a variant of e1; attributes: an optional set attrs of attribute-value pairs to further describe this record. I guess we could also call it responsibleAgent, but the relation already exists in PROV-DM. --Stephan On Apr 27, 2012, at 11:33 AM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: > Stian > > Doesn't this introduce a new relation into the data model? This does not seem prov-o specific or am I missing something? > > Paul > > On Apr 27, 2012, at 17:04, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > >> I've added prov:wasApprovedBy with domain prov:Revision and range >> prov:Agent and suggest closing this issue. >> >> I'm modifying prov:Revision example. >> >> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 00:14, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker >> <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >>> PROV-ISSUE-366: Approving agent in a qualified wasRevisionOf [Ontology] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/366 >>> >>> Raised by: Stephan Zednik >>> On product: Ontology >>> >>> PROV-DM says an agent may be referenced in a Revision Record as the agent that approves that the former is a due variant of the later. >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/#record-Revision >>> >>> 6.3 Revision Record >>> >>> A revision record is a representation of the creation of an entity considered to be a variant of another. Deciding whether something is made available as a revision of something else usually involves an agent who represents someone in the world who takes responsibility for approving that the former is a due variant of the latter. >>> >>> A revision record, written wasRevisionOf(e2,e1,ag,attrs) in PROV-ASN, contains: >>> >>> newer: an identifier e2 identifying an entity that represents a newer version of an entity; >>> older: an identifier e1 identifying an entity that represents an older version of an entity; >>> responsibility: an optional identifier ag for the agent who approved that e2 is a variant of e1; >>> attributes: an optional set attrs of attribute-value pairs to further describe this record. >>> >>> Since prov:agent is a specialization of prov:involvee and is meant to represent the 'rdf:object' of the unqualified relation, I don't think prov:agent works as the relation to represent the approving agent. >>> >>> I think we need a new specialization of prov:involved to represent the approving agent of the derivation, perhaps prov:wasApprovedBy. >>> >>> Or, we can take this back to PROV-DM to get clarification on the intent for having an approving agent of a derivation relationship. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team >> School of Computer Science >> The University of Manchester >> > >
Received on Friday, 27 April 2012 17:49:45 UTC