- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:29:51 +0200
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Sorry for the delayed reply. ISSUE-128 can be closed. Thanks Paul On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: > Paul, > > Could you recommend what needs to be done to settle this issue? > > prov:atLocation is used to reflect the concept in DM: > > A location can be an identifiable geographic place (ISO 19112), but it can also be a non-geographic place such as a directory, row, or column. As such, there are numerous ways in which location can be expressed, such as by a coordinate, address, landmark, and so forth. This document does not specify how to concretely express locations, but instead provide a mechanism to introduce locations, by means of a reserved attribute. > > Section 3.3 of the prov-o html uses prov:atLocation for file paths, Madrid, and a blog URL to illustrate this variety of Locations that can be modeled. > > Thanks, > Tim > > > > On Oct 20, 2011, at 5:31 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > >> >> PROV-ISSUE-128 (Location-Example): Location example uses a filesystem and not a geographical location [Ontology] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/128 >> >> Raised by: Paul Groth >> On product: Ontology >> >> I was looking at the definition of Location in the Ontology and the example talks about a file system path. This seems odd given that the general description of the concept is about a geospatial location. Can this be clarified? >> >> >> >> > > -- -- Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ Assistant Professor Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group Artificial Intelligence Section Department of Computer Science VU University Amsterdam
Received on Sunday, 29 April 2012 11:30:21 UTC