PROV-ISSUE-368 (no-responsibility-in-derivation): No responsibility in derivation [prov-dm] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/368 Raised by: Luc Moreau On product: prov-dm We are having ongoing discussion about responsibility in derivations (see ISSUE-357 and ISSUE-352). In the spirit of simplification, I would like to suggest that agents should not be mentioned in derivation relations. Instead of wasRevisionOf(id,e2,e1,ag,attrs) we should write wasRevisionOf(id,e2,e1,attrs) and wasAttributedTo(e2,ag) Instead of wasQuotedFrom(id,e2,e1,ag2,ag1,attrs) we should write: wasQuotedFrom(id,e2,e1,attrs) and wasAttributedTo(e1,ag1) and wasAttributedTo(e2,ag2) We are not losing in expressivity, I believe, instead, we decouple components 2 and 3 in the data model. Furthermore, if we allow optional arguments in derivations, wasDerivedFrom(id, e2, e1, a, g2, u1, attrs) they should also be allowed in quotation/original source/revision, to make these proper subrelations. Cheers, LucReceived on Monday, 30 April 2012 10:41:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:12 UTC