- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:22:46 -0400
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <8CC2C509-57FF-4E5D-87CA-87960D6C783A@rpi.edu>
This ISSUE has moved forward a few steps. Stian has added prov:inverse annotations to the ontology, and the appendix and table are available at: http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#names-of-inverse-properties Today, the prov-o team agreed to continue on our path of including these inverse names in an appendix and defining the inverses in a separate file. Next steps: * prov-o team (and prov-wg) to review the inverse names at http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#names-of-inverse-properties * Tim to write appropriate narrative for justifying our decisions to define the inverse names separately. Regards, Tim On Apr 16, 2012, at 3:18 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote: > The prov-o team agreed [1] to maintain a separate file that names the inverses of the ObjectProperties in PROV-O, which will be listed in an appendix but not defined in the PROV-O itself. > > To get started with this, I have added a new annotation property "prov:inverse" that provides the local name of the inverse. > I've also defined the prov:inverse for prov:used and prov:wasGeneratedBy. > > I will shortly generate the table for the appendix, which will be derived from these annotations. > > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/7cfaab5c925d > > -Tim > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PIL_OWL_Ontology_Meeting_2012-04-16 > > > On Apr 8, 2012, at 3:30 PM, Daniel Garijo wrote: > >> Hi all, >> there are some inverse properties now in the ontology (like generated), but we have avoided to >> include them as much as we can to keep the model simple. If the creator of this issue is not happy >> with this resolution, I would like to ask him/her to provide some examples showing the need for the inverse >> properties, and why the current model is not enough for capturing them. >> >> This issue is now pending review, and I propose to close it. >> >> Thanks, >> Daniel >> >> 2011/8/25 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> >> >> ISSUE-83: Express inverse relationships in Provenance Model as well as ontology >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/83 >> >> Raised by: >> On product: >> >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Monday, 30 April 2012 19:23:55 UTC