- From: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 17:57:55 -0400
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAAtgn=TE9tUceZqjseweoZyqoVBBLKaJBYDrj2w3eOf6+gb62w@mail.gmail.com>
For what it's worth, this would align with the Basic Formal Ontology definition of Entity: Entity is a Continuent or Occurrent. Continuent: An entity [bfo:Entity] that exists in full at any time in which it exists at all, persists through time while maintaining its identity and has no temporal parts. Occurrent: An entity [bfo:Entity] that has temporal parts and that happens, unfolds or develops through time. Sometimes also called perdurants. Jim On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > ** > All, > > We are now defining entity as follows: > > *An entity is a thing one wants to provide provenance for. For the > purpose of this specification, things can be physical, digital, conceptual, > or otherwise; things may be real or imaginary.* > > Unfortunately, we also provide provenance for activities, etc. > Last week, we agreed we could query the provenance of anything that was > identifiable. > > So, the definition of entity is too broad. > How should it be revised? Can reviewers think about it? > > Regards, > Luc > > > On 19/01/12 09:15, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > PROV-ISSUE-223 (definition-of-entity): What is the definition of entity [prov-dm] > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/223 > > Raised by: Luc Moreau > On product: prov-dm > > The prov-dm documents has some form of definition for entity [1] and entity record [2] (likewise, activity [5] and activity record [6]). > > Recent discussions indicate that the definitions are not rigorous enough, and subject to too much interpretation. > > Indications that an entity can potentially characterize multiple things [3], or that an entity is a class definition [4] are examples of the breadth of interpretation. > > The WG should aim to refine these definitions. > > [1]http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/ProvenanceModel.html#concept-entity > [2] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/ProvenanceModel.html#record-Entity > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2012Jan/0213.html > [4]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2012Jan/0219.html > [5]http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/ProvenanceModel.html#concept-activity > [6]http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/ProvenanceModel.html#record-Activity > > > > -- Jim McCusker Programmer Analyst Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics Yale School of Medicine james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330 http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu PhD Student Tetherless World Constellation Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute mccusj@cs.rpi.edu http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Monday, 2 April 2012 21:58:49 UTC