W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2012

[owl changed] Re: ISSUE-83: Express inverse relationships in Provenance Model as well as ontology

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:18:41 -0400
To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <644DB2B4-8CB7-45E2-A3D8-703B58BE4E3B@rpi.edu>
The prov-o team agreed [1] to maintain a separate file that names the inverses of the ObjectProperties in PROV-O, which will be listed in an appendix but not defined in the PROV-O itself.

To get started with this, I have added a new annotation property "prov:inverse" that provides the local name of the inverse.
I've also defined the prov:inverse for prov:used and prov:wasGeneratedBy.

I will shortly generate the table for the appendix, which will be derived from these annotations.



[1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PIL_OWL_Ontology_Meeting_2012-04-16

On Apr 8, 2012, at 3:30 PM, Daniel Garijo wrote:

> Hi all,
> there are some inverse properties now in the ontology (like generated), but we have avoided to 
> include them as much as we can to keep the model simple. If the creator of this issue is not happy
> with this resolution, I would like to ask him/her to provide some examples showing the need for the inverse
> properties, and why the current model is not enough for capturing them.
> This issue is now pending review, and I propose to close it.
> Thanks,
> Daniel
> 2011/8/25 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
> ISSUE-83: Express inverse relationships in Provenance Model as well as ontology
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/83
> Raised by:
> On product:

Received on Monday, 16 April 2012 19:19:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:11 UTC