- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:43:23 -0400
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi, Daniel. On Apr 9, 2012, at 10:04 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-339 (dgarijo): Domain of "activity" property [Ontology] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/339 > > Raised by: Daniel Garijo > On product: Ontology > > The domain of "activity" property ^^^ Do you have a URI of this property? > is currently "ActivityInvolvement". However when we qualify a Responsability we also associate an activity with prov:activity. No, that is not what prov:activity is for. We use prov:hadActivity, which needs its domain to be relaxed from just a Derivation to include Responsibility. > We should relax the domain and allow "AgentInvolvement" as well. No, that violates the Involvement pattern, which reserves prov:activity to refer to ONLY the object of the reified unqualified triple. The pattern also says to use the hadX properties to reference ancillary resources in an N-ary relation. -Tim > > > >
Received on Monday, 9 April 2012 15:43:53 UTC