- From: Curt Tilmes <Curt.Tilmes@nasa.gov>
- Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 07:41:57 -0400
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On 04/15/2012 07:32 AM, Paul Groth wrote: > Following up, it seems that the point would to be to ensure that > people have to say whether their agent is an entity or activity. > > Is that a correct summary? > > My feeling is that it's one of the three core classes and should be > able to stand on its own but in order to describe an agents provenance > you need to make it either an entity or an activity. I'm suggesting that agents should be just entities and not activities. I'd like to see a good case where an activity is an agent. In the proposed "collaboration" example, I agree with Simon that the collaborating group that is the agent is distinct from the collaboration activity performed by that group. Curt
Received on Sunday, 15 April 2012 11:42:23 UTC