- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 14:26:18 -0400
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Paul, Could you recommend what needs to be done to settle this issue? prov:atLocation is used to reflect the concept in DM: A location can be an identifiable geographic place (ISO 19112), but it can also be a non-geographic place such as a directory, row, or column. As such, there are numerous ways in which location can be expressed, such as by a coordinate, address, landmark, and so forth. This document does not specify how to concretely express locations, but instead provide a mechanism to introduce locations, by means of a reserved attribute. Section 3.3 of the prov-o html uses prov:atLocation for file paths, Madrid, and a blog URL to illustrate this variety of Locations that can be modeled. Thanks, Tim On Oct 20, 2011, at 5:31 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > PROV-ISSUE-128 (Location-Example): Location example uses a filesystem and not a geographical location [Ontology] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/128 > > Raised by: Paul Groth > On product: Ontology > > I was looking at the definition of Location in the Ontology and the example talks about a file system path. This seems odd given that the general description of the concept is about a geospatial location. Can this be clarified? > > > >
Received on Sunday, 22 April 2012 18:26:48 UTC