- From: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
- Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:40:32 -0400
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAtgn=S4rVwt=KPv0-d_v9LJA2-s-NsvX-9zbWoA6x6qjewN6w@mail.gmail.com>
I'm forwarding some feedback (for reference) from David Booth on specializationOf based on a talk I gave at CSHALS this year. I'm glad that this does have precedent. Jim ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org> Date: Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:37 AM Subject: prov:specializationOf To: mccusker@gmail.com Hi Jim, I meant to send this message to you during CSHALS, but apparently I forgot. :( I just noticed it in my Drafts folder. Thanks for your presentation at CSHALS! It was interesting to see, and nice to meet you in person! FYI, the prov:specializationOf property is very similar to the s:isNarrowerThanResource property described at http://dbooth.org/2007/splitting/ AFAICT, the main difference seems to be that s:isNarrowerThanResource applies to the declared meaning (or nominal meaning) of two URIs, whereas prov:specializationOf applies to the meaning of the two URIs in context, which normally will involve additional assertions. This arose out of my own quest to figure out how semantic web architecture works (or should work), how a URI gets its meaning, and how that meaning should be formalized. Best wishes, -- David Booth, Ph.D. http://dbooth.org/ Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of his employer. -- Jim McCusker Programmer Analyst Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics Yale School of Medicine james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330 http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu PhD Student Tetherless World Constellation Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute mccusj@cs.rpi.edu http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Sunday, 15 April 2012 18:41:22 UTC