Validation error frequencies
Re: ISSUE-20 (table-headers): Improvements to the table-headers algorithm in the HTML 5 spec [HTML 5 spec]
Re: HTML5 and XML syntax
Header cell in top left of data tables
HTML5 draft: id attribute question
lang and RFC3066
Re: HTML WG Action-46: javascript scheme
img issue: should we restrict the URI
- Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI
- Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI
- Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI
- Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI
Javascript URI scheme (ACTION-46)
img issue: should we restrict the URI
- Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI
- Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI
- Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI
{minutes} HTML WG teleconference 2008-01-24
Underline element issue.
handling comments on behalf of the HTML WG
ISSUE-29 (scope-uri-schemes): Should the HTML 5 specification introduce URI schemes such as javascript:? [HTML Principles/Requirements]
- Re: ISSUE-29 (scope-uri-schemes): Should the HTML 5 specification introduce URI schemes such as javascript:? [HTML Principles/Requirements]
- Re: ISSUE-29 (scope-uri-schemes): Should the HTML 5 specification introduce URI schemes such as javascript:? [HTML Principles/Requirements]
ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements]
- Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements]
- Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements]
- Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements]
- Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements]
- Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements]
- Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements]
- Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements]
- Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements]
- Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements]
- Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements]
- Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements]
- Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements]
- Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements]
- Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements]
- Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements]
- Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements]
HTML 5 WD (not technical)
Re: Graceful degradation of sectioning elements
Call for Exclusions: HTML 5; HTML 5 differences from HTML 4
Re: Versioning and html[5]
Re: Examples of colgroup/rowgroup attributes
Suggestions for improvement
3.8.3. The nav element
prose content and del elements (typo?)
iframe@security
Re: [whatwg] WF2 - <form action="">
no HTML WG teleconference this week (maybe IRC office hours)
[WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages
[WF2] form.submit() should not throw if form is invalid
[WF2] backwards compatibility with values of custom required attributes
Canvas path transformations
Proposed HTML ping attribute
IMG tag
Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5"
- Re: Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5"
- Re: Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5"
- Re: Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5"
input type="file" problems
SMIL Timesheets 1.0 Last Call Transition Announcement
HTML vs XHTML issue
Suffestions for improvement
Re: Underline element minor points
Re: DogFood
Changes to the Status of this Document section to address recent feedback
Contexts in which <menu> is allowed
Re: Detailed review of 3.12.10. The time element
Re: Detailed review of 4.11. Client-side persistent storage
New Input type proposal
- Re: New Input type proposal
- Re: New Input type proposal
- Re: New Input type proposal
- Re: New Input type proposal
- Re: New Input type proposal
- Re: New Input type proposal
- Re: New Input type proposal
- Re: New Input type proposal
- Re: New Input type proposal
Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
- Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
- Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5
<style scoped> and semi-transparent content models
- Re: <style scoped> and semi-transparent content models
- Re: <style scoped> and semi-transparent content models
Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG
SURVEY: Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? ISSUE-19
- Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? ISSUE-19
- Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? ISSUE-19
- Reminder for organizations to vote (was Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? ISSUE-19)
- Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? ISSUE-19