- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:36:24 -0000
- To: "'HTML WG Public List'" <public-html@w3.org>
Yes, please point to BCP 47. It is intended to be an unchanging reference, unlike the RFC numbers. (Note that a successor to RFC 4646 is likely to appear soon - the RFC will have a completely different number, but the spec can still be referred to as BCP 47.) RI ============ Richard Ishida Internationalization Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/International/ http://rishida.net/blog/ http://rishida.net/ > -----Original Message----- > From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Anne van Kesteren > Sent: 26 January 2008 14:26 > To: Doug Jones; HTML WG Public List > Subject: Re: lang and RFC3066 > > > On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:02:34 +0100, Doug Jones <doug_b_jones@mac.com> > wrote: > > The HTML5 spec at 3.4.3.states to use RFC3066 for the lang or xml:lang > > attributes. This should be updated. > > Maybe pointing to BCP47 is better so we don't have to address this each > time they issue a new RFC. > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > <http://annevankesteren.nl/> > <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 17:33:12 UTC