Re: HTML WG Action-46: javascript scheme

On 1/25/08, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I asked Björn about the status of the Javascript scheme draft:
>
> > * Julian Reschke wrote:
> >> in yesterday's HTML WG conference call I got the action item
> >> <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/46>: "Ask B. Hoehrmann about
> >> any plans to update
> >> http://www.websitedev.de/ietf/draft-hoehrmann-javascript-ri-00.txt".
> >>
> >> I understand the latest draft that was submitted with respect to the
> >> Javascript scheme actually is
> >> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hoehrmann-javascript-scheme-00>, right?
>
> And here's what he replied:
>
> > That is correct, and my plan is to make some changes to the security
> > considerations section and submit it for publication as RFC some time
> > after making those changes. It is not a high priority item, but I'd
> > think I'll do it some time in Q1 2008.
>
> This should close ACTION-46.

I'd forgotten about Bjoern's draft.

Bjoern, if you could also update the draft to request provisional
registration and use the template in sec 5.4 of RFC 4395, it would
appreciated and add some notes about the aspects of section 2 which
aren't being followed.  Also, if you have time, perhaps you could
satisfy the SHOULD level requirement in section 3 about describing
what requirements of section 2 aren't met and why.  I can help if you
like.

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.  Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.         http://www.markbaker.ca
Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies  http://www.coactus.com

Received on Friday, 25 January 2008 17:11:25 UTC