- From: Olivier GENDRIN <olivier.gendrin@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:07:16 +0100
- To: "HTMLWG List" <public-html@w3.org>
On Jan 7, 2008 7:52 AM, Tom Morris <tom@tommorris.org> wrote: > > On Jan 7, 2008 12:25 AM, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> wrote: > > Le 6 janv. 2008 à 16:55, Tom Morris a écrit : > > > The HTML WG, in it's wisdom, have decided that web authors do not > > > need any kind > > > of RDF-in-HTML solution, > > > > not true. The HTML WG didn't make this decision. > > > > Well, they haven't explicitly made that decision, but since attempts to > include either GRDDL (via the head/@profile attribute) or RDFa seem to > fall on 'pragmatically deaf' ears, it seems like a reasonable inference. Hopefully, it's not. As far as we need consensus to take a decision, the main risk is for now that this issues may be burried and forgotten. We still have time to take others WG needs in account... -- Olivier G. http://www.lespacedunmatin.info/blog/
Received on Monday, 7 January 2008 15:07:22 UTC