- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 04:22:04 +0000
- To: HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>
Ben Boyle wrote: > The > valid markup camp is particularly strong as we are constrained by WCAG > compliance, and thus must "use markup properly" [2]. > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/wai-pageauth.html#tech-identify-grammar Note, however, that WCAG 2 (currently in second Last Call Working Draft) does not require validity, just well formed markup http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#ensure-compat I'd hazard a guess that, by the time HTML 5 lands, WCAG 2 will be the reference point, rather than the now fairly outdated WCAG 1. P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com ______________________________________________________________ Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________ Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team http://streetteam.webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________
Received on Saturday, 19 January 2008 04:22:28 UTC