W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2008

Re: iframe@security

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 04:22:04 +0000
Message-ID: <47917AEC.7090800@splintered.co.uk>
To: HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>

Ben Boyle wrote:
> The
> valid markup camp is particularly strong as we are constrained by WCAG
> compliance, and thus must "use markup properly" [2].

> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/wai-pageauth.html#tech-identify-grammar

Note, however, that WCAG 2 (currently in second Last Call Working Draft) 
does not require validity, just well formed markup
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#ensure-compat

I'd hazard a guess that, by the time HTML 5 lands, WCAG 2 will be the 
reference point, rather than the now fairly outdated WCAG 1.

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
______________________________________________________________
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team
http://streetteam.webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Received on Saturday, 19 January 2008 04:22:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:29 UTC