W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2008

Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI

From: Guillaume Ludwig <contact@gmli.fr>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:27:15 +0100
To: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>, public-html@w3.org
Message-Id: <200801251427.15497.contact@gmli.fr>

Dr. Olaf Hoffmann wrote:

> object is more a generic element for problematic cases, if nothing
> else describes the purpose of the content better. Maybe authors
> have to use attributes like role/class to specify it better.

OK, I agree.

> No, if it has the same functionality than object, authors have
> the chance to provide alternative content in different formats
> and if the viewer/user-agent provides an interface, the
> reader/user may chose what is the best 'display' for
> the intended purpose and his access to the problem.

Exactly the same way as the object element ? For example we 
have an image, and a text alternative, then an audio alternative ?


Guillaume LUDWIG - GMLi
Received on Friday, 25 January 2008 13:27:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:29 UTC