Re: HTML 5 WD (not technical)

On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> I think it would be friendly, though not strictly necessary, to give an 
> acknowledgment to the HTML Working Group collectively, since it voted to 
> accept the current draft and advance it to FWPD, and has provided a 
> forum for discussion that can include parties which might be unable to 
> participate in WHATWG. Providing structure is worth something, and 
> progressing along the W3C standards track is a great thing for HTML5. 
> But I leave it to Editor's discretion.

Yes, I updated the acknowledgements section in response to Daniel's 
original e-mail to mention all the various places that discussion has been 
happening, including public-html. I was just debating Daniel's suggestion 
that more people should be named.

I'm sure the acknowledgements section will evolve over time. I would 
really recommend that people spend their time studying more substantive 
parts of the spec.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Thursday, 24 January 2008 09:18:33 UTC