- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:18:08 +0000
- To: public-html@w3.org
Quoting Alexander Mueller <alexm@gmx.at>: > Well, thats what SSL is for and I dont think we need a better one > here. However there we still have the issue of the actual password > being revealed to the server side. Unless I'm misinterpreting your intentions, you want to plug a potential problem on the server side (prying eyes of an administrator, or a compromised/hacked server) through a client-side solution? I might be wrong, but my gut feeling is that you're trying to fix your potential problem at the wrong end. P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com ______________________________________________________________ Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________ Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team http://streetteam.webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2008 12:19:56 UTC