- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:07:47 -0500
- To: "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: "HTML Issue Tracking WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On 1/23/08, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote: > I think javascript: needs to be treated as grandfathered even if > registered after the IRI RFC. Otherwise, the conformance requirements > will be annoying and unpractical. That is, it is counter-intuitive to > apply the generic IRI syntax to javascript:. The provisional registration process requires only that any deviations from the generic syntax be noted[1], not disallowed, which is why I recommended it. [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4395#section-3 Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.com
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:08:11 UTC