- From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 16:56:20 +0100
- To: public-html@w3.org
> Dr. Olaf Hoffmann wrote: > > Because the intellectual capacities of readers of literature are > > typically limited, > > Could you cite any authority to support this quite > remarkable assertion ? > > Philip TAYLOR You can cite me, if you need any authority ;o) That is not just my personal observation, working at a university. I never tried to test it systematically, but it should be simple to test this assertion experimentally with texts about modern physics or mathematics with a random choice of readers, should still work, even if they have a general basic education in these fields. My observation is based on such not systematic 'experiments' like diploma-thesis, Phd-thesis, scientific papers, as author, co-author and corrector. I think it is applicable to other fields too - both the limitation of intellectual capacities of authors and readers is the interesting part on writing good literature (scientic of other stuff too) - and authors need any help they can get, to write what they mean and communicate to the readers, what they really intented to write, especially if authors are experts on their field of work, but not on writing itself - I think, this is one typical case for content in the internet too - the other typical case of course is, that they are neither experts on the theme nor on writing itself ;o) And mixed formats like XHTML+MathML+SVG can be very helpful for authors, if those formats are improved in some areas. If the content model and element (name)s are choosen and are available in such a way, that they help authors to structure thoughts to something useful.
Received on Friday, 4 January 2008 16:02:00 UTC