- From: Dmitry Turin <html60@narod.ru>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 15:30:39 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
Ivan, >> Now we have two way to write service information in html-document: >> 1) in <!name > (e.g. <!doctype > >> 2) in <?name?> (e.g. <?xml ?>, <?xml-stylesheet ?> >> I propose to unify and use <?tag ?> in any case. IE> maybe it will create a lot of incompatibility. Look at every <!ENTITY>, IE> <![CDATA[...]]> etc. IE> Especially CDATA will create incompatibility. It's used in every web IE> application or web services, e.g. XML-RPC. Remote procedure call ? IE> But why not, it's not a bad idea, but it requires thoughtfulness. I went from that, mixting of <tag> and <?tag?> <x> <y> <?r?> </y> </x> allow to get mixting of _stream of data_ and _stream of command_ . I.e. ideology is to get two "layer", i even intend __mixted XPath__ like x/y/?r/k/m/?s And i'd like to get <!tag!> free for principle-other destination (for future). I have some doubt about transformation <![CDATA[...]]> into <?[CDATA[...]]?> (maybe into some more simple, into <?cdata data=" "?> with counting of open and close sign " ). What's about compatibility, we can save previous variant (i.e. <!tag>) for transitional period. P.S. Say me, please, what is not incomprehensible and what is badly stated in http://sql50.euro.ru/sql5.ppt I will show this presentation in russian "mirror" committee for ISO, and I would be very thankfull for all remarks. Dmitry Turin HTML6 (6.5.1) http://html60.euro.ru SQL5 (5.9.1) http://sql50.euro.ru Unicode7 (7.2.1) http://unicode70.euro.ru Computer2 (2.0.2) http://computer20.euro.ru
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2008 13:29:39 UTC