W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2008

Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:43:08 +0100
To: "Jeff Schiller" <codedread@gmail.com>
Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.t5h0x6rt64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:22:13 +0100, Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>  
wrote:
> Great - this behavior is exactly what I'd like to get defined in the
> spec for <img> so that it is non-ambiguous what an "image" is and how
> it behaves.

To be honest, given that this impacts several CSS features, <svg:image>  
probably, and maybe other specifications as well defining it in HTML 5  
seems like a bit of stretch. Makes more sense as part of the SVG  
specification in my opinion.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 25 January 2008 18:39:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:29 UTC