- From: Peter Krantz <peter.krantz@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:43:09 +0100
- To: "Philip Taylor (Webmaster)" <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk>
- Cc: HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>
On 1/14/08, Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk> wrote: > Hmmm, I would want to argue against the inclusion > of either "firstName" or "surname" on the grounds > that their semantics are ill-defined (cultural > differences ascribe different semantics); "familyname" > and "givenname" I regard as unexceptionable. > ...and that's what a vocabulary is about. E.g. FOAF defines what these terms mean and how they relate to other terms. If you don't agree with FOAF you are of course free to specify your own vocabulary. Cultural differences often makes it difficult to specify meaningful terms whose meaning is shared among many. And, with subclassing you can start from e.g. foaf:firstName and provide additional meaning in a vocabulary that is understood in your culture. Your question touches on an important issue. Defining vocabularies for global use is difficult. Therefore it should be possible to do this in a distributed fashion, locally. Anytime we discuss new elements that belong to a specific domain we should be aware of this issue. /Peter
Received on Monday, 14 January 2008 18:43:26 UTC