- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:55:02 +0100
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- CC: Dean Edridge <dean@55.co.nz>, HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2008 16:54:02 UTC
Lachlan Hunt wrote: > By "certain other working groups", I assume you are referring to the > XHTML2 WG. However, no-one I know of is in the least bit concerned > about upsetting them in regards to the name "XHTML". <bandwidth-waste> I have taken part in many standardization groups in past, but I have never encountered such high level of indignity as this group produces. Folks, please try to be constructive and positive and if you really can't resist such tart comments please present them in an appropriate place like pub. </bandwidth-waste> IMHO, at some point in the time usage of XHTML brand have to be agreed between HTML and XHTML2 WG. Such statements will make such agreement very hard to achieve. Have a nice day, Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2008 16:54:02 UTC