- From: Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:54:12 +0000
- To: "connolly@w3.org >> Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: public-html@w3.org, public-html-wg-announce <public-html-wg-announce@w3.org>
Could you please remind members of the WG whether the Design Principles have yet been formally agreed and/or published ? Philip TAYLOR -------- Dan Connolly wrote: > The previous news on ISSUE-19 / HTML 5 specification release(s) > was: > January 22 publication date > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Dec/0234.html > > Toward that end, please answer these questions using the > web-based survey... > > <blockquote cite="http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd-html5-spec/"> > > Shall we release HTML 5 as a W3C Working Draft? Specifically, the > co-chairs (Dan Connolly and Chris Wilson) will choose between v1.344 > (Thu Dec 20 21:42:20 2007 UTC) and any later revisions from the editors > this week. > > ... > > Provided the question above carries, Shall we release HTML 5 differences > from HTML 4 as a W3C Working Draft? Specifically, revision 1.33 of > 2007-10-22 11:17:20 plus any publication-related changes (e.g. status > section, typos, broken links) agreed by the editor (Anne van Kesteren) > and one of Dan Connolly, Chris Wilson, or Mike Smith. > > ... > > As publication is necessary for progress of the group and this is a > non-technical question, we will decide it by counting votes. A quorum is > 50 working group participants, including half the 28 participating W3C > member organizations. Provided we have a quorum and at least 2/3rds of > the non-blank votes are 'yes', the question carries. > > ... > > *This survey is subject to change for the first day or so, i.e. until > the end of the 10 January teleconference.* > > </blockquote> >
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2008 22:56:33 UTC