- From: Alexander Mueller <alexm@gmx.at>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:24:03 +0100
- To: public-html@w3.org
- Cc: Chasen Le Hara <rendezvouscp@gmail.com>, "Preston L. Bannister" <preston@bannister.us>
Chasen Le Hara wrote: > > > > Is a UA that does not support Javascript viable? I suspect the > > answer is "not". > > It's not any less viable than a UA that allows ECMAScript to be turned > off. Exactly. Of course it is also possible to implement this via JavaScript, but thats the reason for this proposal. To have a well defined, native element a site can rely on, without the need to reimplement it each and every time. Alexander -- Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2008 09:24:23 UTC