- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 07:37:38 -0600
- To: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
- Cc: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, public-html@w3.org
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 12:53 +0900, Michael(tm) Smith wrote: > Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, 2008-01-11 22:59 +0100: > > > Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > >> (Incidentally, although the survey mentions 28 participating Member > >> organizations, I could 29 if W3C is counted 3 times, 27 if it is counted > >> once. Which is correct? Will all three W3C organizations be voting?) > > > > The list of participants says 27 organisations (see summary at the bottom > > of the page). So, I assume this means that the W3C can only vote once. > > > > http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=40318&public=1 > > Yeah, I'm not sure where the 28-organizations figure came from > originally, I counted the member orgs listed on http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/40318/status That only counts W3C once, but it counts * Vectoreal (no representative) * Volantis Systems Ltd (no representative) which is probably not a good idea. > but the 27-organizations figure is the correct one. So > we need 13.5 organizations to respond in order to reach quorum... Let's hope it doesn't matter. Oh... and Mike, don't forget to coordinate W3C's response to the survey. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Saturday, 12 January 2008 13:37:47 UTC