public-html@w3.org from January 2008 by date

Thursday, 31 January 2008

• Re: Validation error frequencies Sam Ruby
• Re: Validation error frequencies Henri Sivonen
• Validation error frequencies Henri Sivonen

Wednesday, 30 January 2008

• Re: ISSUE-29 (scope-uri-schemes): Should the HTML 5 specification introduce URI schemes such as javascript:? [HTML Principles/Requirements] Dan Connolly
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Anne van Kesteren

Tuesday, 29 January 2008

• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Boris Zbarsky
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI liorean
• Re: Regarding the <abbr> tag Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• RE: lang and RFC3066 Richard Ishida
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Boris Zbarsky
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Boris Zbarsky
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Regarding the <abbr> tag Wesley.Upchurch@semcoinc.com
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI David Dailey
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: Header cell in top left of data tables Olivier GENDRIN
• Re: Header cell in top left of data tables Ben Boyle

Monday, 28 January 2008

• Re: ISSUE-20 (table-headers): Improvements to the table-headers algorithm in the HTML 5 spec [HTML 5 spec] James Graham
• Re: Regarding the <abbr> tag Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Re: HTML5 and XML syntax liorean
• Re: Regarding the <abbr> tag Wesley.Upchurch@semcoinc.com
• Re: Header cell in top left of data tables Olivier GENDRIN
• Re: Header cell in top left of data tables Ben Boyle
• Re: Header cell in top left of data tables Olivier GENDRIN
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Anne van Kesteren
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Jeff Schiller
• Re: Header cell in top left of data tables Ben 'Cerbera' Millard

Sunday, 27 January 2008

• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Boris Zbarsky
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI liorean
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Header cell in top left of data tables Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
• Re: Header cell in top left of data tables James Graham
• Header cell in top left of data tables Ben Boyle

Saturday, 26 January 2008

• Re: HTML5 draft: id attribute question Smylers
• Re: HTML5 draft: id attribute question Anne van Kesteren
• HTML5 draft: id attribute question David Naylor
• Re: ISSUE-29 (scope-uri-schemes): Should the HTML 5 specification introduce URI schemes such as javascript:? [HTML Principles/Requirements] Anne van Kesteren
• Re: lang and RFC3066 Anne van Kesteren
• lang and RFC3066 Doug Jones
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (<image>) Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
• Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Regarding the <abbr> tag Ben Boyle
• Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] Boris Zbarsky

Friday, 25 January 2008

• Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] T.V Raman
• Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] Roy T. Fielding
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Boris Zbarsky
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Anne van Kesteren
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Jeff Schiller
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Anne van Kesteren
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Adam Roben
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (<image>) Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Jeff Schiller
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Anne van Kesteren
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Boris Zbarsky
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Jeff Schiller
• Re: HTML WG Action-46: javascript scheme Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: HTML WG Action-46: javascript scheme Mark Baker
• Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] Julian Reschke
• Re: Versioning and html[5] Hallvord R. M. Steen
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] Boris Zbarsky
• Re: HTML WG Action-46: javascript scheme Julian Reschke
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Guillaume Ludwig
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (<image>) j.j.
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI j.j.
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Guillaume Ludwig
• Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] Julian Reschke
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Dave Singer
• Re: Javascript URI scheme (ACTION-46) Julian Reschke
• img issue: should we restrict the URI Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: Javascript URI scheme (ACTION-46) Ian Hickson
• Javascript URI scheme (ACTION-46) Julian Reschke

Thursday, 24 January 2008

• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Guillaume Ludwig
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI Patrick H. Lauke
• img issue: should we restrict the URI Jeff Schiller
• Re: HTML 5 WD (not technical) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] Mark Baker
• {minutes} HTML WG teleconference 2008-01-24 Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Regarding the <abbr> tag Wesley.Upchurch@semcoinc.com
• Re: HTML 5 WD (not technical) Ian Hickson
• Re: HTML 5 WD (not technical) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: HTML 5 WD (not technical) Ian Hickson
• Re: HTML 5 WD (not technical) Daniel Glazman
• Re: Graceful degradation of sectioning elements j.j.
• Re: Underline element issue. Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Versioning and html[5] Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
• Re: HTML 5 WD (not technical) Ian Hickson
• RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson

Wednesday, 23 January 2008

• Underline element issue. Ivan Enderlin
• Re: ISSUE-29 (scope-uri-schemes): Should the HTML 5 specification introduce URI schemes such as javascript:? [HTML Principles/Requirements] Mark Baker
• dual [sic] approach to ARIA embedding [was: Re: upcoming ARIA publicatoins, test coordination (ISSUE-14)] Al Gilman
• Re: ISSUE-29 (scope-uri-schemes): Should the HTML 5 specification introduce URI schemes such as javascript:? [HTML Principles/Requirements] Henri Sivonen
• Re: ISSUE-29 (scope-uri-schemes): Should the HTML 5 specification introduce URI schemes such as javascript:? [HTML Principles/Requirements] Mark Baker
• Re: Versioning and html[5] (ISSUE-4) Dan Connolly
• handling comments on behalf of the HTML WG Dan Connolly
• Re: HTML 5 WD (not technical) Wesley.Upchurch@semcoinc.com
• ISSUE-29 (scope-uri-schemes): Should the HTML 5 specification introduce URI schemes such as javascript:? [HTML Principles/Requirements] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-28 (http-mime-override): Content type rules in HTML 5 overlaps with the HTTP specification? [HTML Principles/Requirements] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re: upcoming ARIA publicatoins, test coordination (ISSUE-14) Dan Connolly
• HTML 5 WD (not technical) Daniel Glazman
• Re: New Input type proposal Alexander Mueller
• Re: Graceful degradation of sectioning elements Philip Taylor
• Re: New Input type proposal Alexander Mueller
• Re: Versioning and html[5] Ben 'Cerbera' Millard

Monday, 21 January 2008

• Re: Suggestions for improvement Sam Kuper
• Re: Suggestions for improvement Sam Kuper

Wednesday, 23 January 2008

• Re: Versioning and html[5] Arne Johannessen

Tuesday, 22 January 2008

• Re: Versioning and html[5] Samuel Santos
• Call for Exclusions: HTML 5; HTML 5 differences from HTML 4 Ian B. Jacobs
• RE: Versioning and html[5] Chris Wilson
• Re: Versioning and html[5] Smylers
• Re: Examples of colgroup/rowgroup attributes Ben 'Cerbera' Millard

Saturday, 12 January 2008

• Suggestions for improvement Howard Cary Morris

Monday, 21 January 2008

• Re: iframe@security Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: iframe@security Joshue O Connor
• Re: iframe@security Anne van Kesteren
• Re: iframe@security Joshue O Connor
• Re: iframe@security Joshue O Connor
• RE: iframe@security Richard Conyard
• Re: iframe@security Anne van Kesteren
• Re: iframe@security Joshue O Connor
• Re: prose content and del elements (typo?) Ben Boyle

Sunday, 20 January 2008

• Re: prose content and del elements (typo?) Henri Sivonen

Saturday, 19 January 2008

• Re: 3.8.3. The nav element Simon Pieters
• 3.8.3. The nav element Ben Boyle
• prose content and del elements (typo?) Ben Boyle
• Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? ISSUE-19 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: iframe@security Patrick H. Lauke
• iframe@security Ben Boyle

Friday, 18 January 2008

• Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? ISSUE-19 Dan Connolly
• Re: [WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages Hallvord R. M. Steen
• Re: [whatwg] WF2 - <form action=""> Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [whatwg] WF2 - <form action=""> Boris Zbarsky

Thursday, 17 January 2008

• Re: [whatwg] WF2 - <form action=""> Laurens Holst
• ACTION-23 modified/pending review Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Re: [whatwg] WF2 - <form action=""> Geoff Richards
• Re: [whatwg] WF2 - <form action=""> Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [whatwg] WF2 - <form action=""> Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [whatwg] WF2 - <form action=""> Laurens Holst

Wednesday, 16 January 2008

• Re: New Input type proposal Chasen Le Hara

Thursday, 17 January 2008

• RE: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed Chris Wilson
• RE: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed Chris Wilson

Wednesday, 16 January 2008

• no HTML WG teleconference this week (maybe IRC office hours) Dan Connolly
• Re: [WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages Ian Hickson
• Re: [WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages Laurens Holst
• [WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages Hallvord R. M. Steen
• [WF2] form.submit() should not throw if form is invalid Hallvord R. M. Steen
• [WF2] backwards compatibility with values of custom required attributes Hallvord R. M. Steen
• Re: Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5" Joshue O Connor
• Re: Issues with <input type="hash"> (was Re: New Input type proposal) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Issues with <input type="hash"> (was Re: New Input type proposal) Alexander Mueller
• Issues with <input type="hash"> (was Re: New Input type proposal) Matthew Raymond
• Re: IMG tag Dave Singer
• Re: IMG tag Garrett Smith
• Re: New Input type proposal Alexander Mueller
• Re: New Input type proposal Preston L. Bannister
• Re: Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5" Karl Dubost
• names Re: Underline element. Charles McCathieNevile
• names Re: Underline element. Charles McCathieNevile
• Canvas path transformations Philip Taylor
• Re: Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5" Charles McCathieNevile

Tuesday, 15 January 2008

• Proposed HTML ping attribute noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: IMG tag Jon Barnett
• IMG tag Wesley.Upchurch@semcoinc.com
• Re: Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5" Wesley.Upchurch@semcoinc.com
• Re: Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5" James Graham
• Re: Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5" James Graham
• Re: Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5" Jirka Kosek
• Re: Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5" Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Re: Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5" Lachlan Hunt
• Please change the current name of the specification to "HTML5 and XHTML5" Dean Edridge

Monday, 14 January 2008

• Re: Underline element. Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Re: Underline element. Patrick Garies
• Re: Underline element. Peter Krantz
• Re: Underline element. Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Re: Underline element. Peter Krantz
• RE: Suffestions for improvement David Orchard
• Re: Underline element. Patrick Garies
• Re: Underline element. Patrick Garies
• Re: input type="file" problems Samuel Santos
• Re: input type="file" problems Boris Zbarsky
• Re: input type="file" problems Samuel Santos
• Re: Underline element. Olivier GENDRIN
• Re: Underline element. Patrick Garies
• Re: Underline element. Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Re: Underline element. Olivier GENDRIN
• input type="file" problems Samuel Santos
• Re: Underline element. Patrick Garies
• Re: New Input type proposal Geoffrey Sneddon
• SMIL Timesheets 1.0 Last Call Transition Announcement Thierry Michel
• Re: New Input type proposal Alexander Mueller
• Re: New Input type proposal Alexander Mueller
• Re: Suffestions for improvement Ben Boyle
• Re: DogFood Henri Sivonen
• HTML vs XHTML issue Ian Hickson
• Re: DogFood Sam Ruby

Saturday, 12 January 2008

• Suffestions for improvement Howard Cary Morris

Monday, 14 January 2008

• Re: Underline element minor points Jim Jewett

Sunday, 13 January 2008

• Re: DogFood Henri Sivonen
• Re: Changes to the Status of this Document section to address recent feedback Doug Schepers
• Changes to the Status of this Document section to address recent feedback Ian Hickson

Saturday, 12 January 2008

• Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
• Re: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed Yann
• Contexts in which <menu> is allowed Henri Sivonen
• Re: Reminder for organizations to vote Dan Connolly
• Re: Detailed review of 3.12.10. The time element Mihai Sucan
• Re: Reminder for organizations to vote Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG Dean Edridge
• RE: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed Chris Wilson

Friday, 11 January 2008

• Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5 Daniel Schattenkirchner
• Re: Reminder for organizations to vote Lachlan Hunt
• Reminder for organizations to vote (was Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? ISSUE-19) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Detailed review of 4.11. Client-side persistent storage Mihai Sucan
• Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG (and story telling) Dan Connolly
• Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
• Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5 Ben Boyle
• Re: New Input type proposal Alexander Mueller
• Re: New Input type proposal Alexander Mueller
• Re: New Input type proposal Preston L. Bannister
• Re: New Input type proposal Olivier GENDRIN
• Re: New Input type proposal Maciej Stachowiak

Thursday, 10 January 2008

• Re: New Input type proposal Martin Atkins
• Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG Preston L. Bannister
• Re: New Input type proposal Alexander Mueller
• Re: New Input type proposal Alexander Mueller
• Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG Dan Connolly
• Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? ISSUE-19 Dan Connolly
• Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG Sylvain Eliade
• Re: New Input type proposal Thomas Pike
• Re: <style scoped> and semi-transparent content models Henri Sivonen
• Re: <style scoped> and semi-transparent content models Henri Sivonen
• Re: New Input type proposal Philip Taylor
• Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG Dean Edridge
• Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5 Lachlan Hunt

Wednesday, 9 January 2008

• New Input type proposal Alexander Mueller

Thursday, 10 January 2008

• Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5 Dean Edridge
• Re: supporting both formats html5 & xhtml5 re: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#xhtml5 Dean Edridge
• <style scoped> and semi-transparent content models Henri Sivonen
• Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? ISSUE-19 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? ISSUE-19 Lachlan Hunt

Wednesday, 9 January 2008

• Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? ISSUE-19 Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Dissatisfaction with HTML WG Dan Connolly
• SURVEY: Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft? ISSUE-19 Dan Connolly
• Re[2]: <?doctype ?> instead of <!doctype > Dmitry Turin
• Re[2]: <?doctype ?> instead of <!doctype > Dmitry Turin
• Re: Underline element. Philip Taylor (Webmaster)

Tuesday, 8 January 2008

• Re: Case-sensitivity of attribute values wrt Selectors Simon Pieters
• Re: <?doctype ?> instead of <!doctype > David Håsäther
• Re: <?doctype ?> instead of <!doctype > Ivan Enderlin
• <?doctype ?> instead of <!doctype > Dmitry Turin

Monday, 7 January 2008

• Re: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed David Gerard

Tuesday, 8 January 2008

• Re: Underline element. Philip TAYLOR
• Re: RDFa use cases (was: Underline element.) Philip TAYLOR

Monday, 7 January 2008

• Re: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed Dave Singer
• Re: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed Dave Singer
• Re: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed Federico Bianco Prevot
• Re: Underline element. Olivier GENDRIN
• Re: RDFa Re: Underline element. Olivier GENDRIN
• Re: Underline element. Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Underline element. DESCHAMPS Stephane ROSI/SI CLIENT
• Decision making Re: RDFa Re: Underline element. Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Underline element. Ca Phun Ung
• Re: Underline element. Ca Phun Ung
• Re: RDFa Re: Underline element. Tom Morris
• RDFa Re: Underline element. Karl Dubost

Sunday, 6 January 2008

• Re: Underline element. Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Underline element. Tom Morris
• Re: Underline element. Ben Boyle
• RDFa use cases (was: Underline element.) Peter Krantz
• Re: Underline element. Lachlan Hunt

Saturday, 5 January 2008

• Re: Underline element. Peter Krantz
• Re: Underline element. Ben Boyle
• Re: Underline element. Henri Sivonen
• Case-sensitivity of attribute values wrt Selectors Simon Pieters

Friday, 4 January 2008

• Re: Underline element. Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: DogFood (and inline/block constraints) Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: Underline element. Peter Krantz

Thursday, 3 January 2008

• Re: Underline element. Ca Phun Ung

Friday, 4 January 2008

• usemap and case-sensitivity Henri Sivonen
• Re: Underline element. Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: Order of nodes from getElementsByClassName Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Underline element. Patrick H. Lauke
• Order of nodes from getElementsByClassName James Graham

Thursday, 3 January 2008

• DOCTYPE sniffing incomplete Anne van Kesteren

Wednesday, 2 January 2008

• Re: Underline element. Philip Taylor
• Re: Underline element. Patrick Garies
• Re: Underline element. Olivier GENDRIN
• <script> execution and load event dispatching Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Underline element. Karl Dubost
• Re: Underline element. Maciej Stachowiak

Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2008 23:52:29 UTC