Friday, 30 December 2016
Sunday, 25 December 2016
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
 - Re: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 
Saturday, 24 December 2016
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00 for general structured data
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, identifier, h1_blob
 - draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, identifier, h1_blob
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00 for general structured data
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00 for general structured data
 
Friday, 23 December 2016
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00 for general structured data
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00 for general structured data
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00 for general structured data
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - [ietf-http-wg] <none>
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - (rephrasing, sorry for duplicate) | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding
 - Re: New versions of encryption drafts
 - I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-06.txt
 
Thursday, 22 December 2016
- Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00 for general structured data
 - Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
 - RE: Expectations for TLS session reuse
 - draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00 for general structured data
 - Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
 - Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
 - Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
 - Re: New versions of encryption drafts
 - draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding
 - New versions of encryption drafts
 - I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-09.txt
 - I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-05.txt
 
Wednesday, 21 December 2016
- Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
 - Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
 - RE: Expectations for TLS session reuse
 - Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 
Tuesday, 20 December 2016
Monday, 19 December 2016
- Call For Adoption Live Byte Ranges
 - Fwd: Last Call: <draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-11.txt> (Use of the Prefer Header Field in Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV)) to Proposed Standard
 
Saturday, 17 December 2016
Friday, 16 December 2016
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4891)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 
Thursday, 15 December 2016
- Re: Call for Adoption: Expect-CT
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: Call for Adoption: Expect-CT
 
Wednesday, 14 December 2016
- Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Unicode escape sequence | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
 
Tuesday, 13 December 2016
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - RE: Expectations for TLS session reuse
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00, unicode range
 - RE: Expectations for TLS session reuse
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: Call for Adoption: Expect-CT
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
 
Monday, 12 December 2016
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-00.txt
 - Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
 - Re: Call for Adoption: Expect-CT
 - RE: Expectations for TLS session reuse
 - RE: Expectations for TLS session reuse
 
Saturday, 10 December 2016
Friday, 9 December 2016
- Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
 - Re: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable
 - Re: Call for Adoption: Expect-CT
 - Re: Expectations for TLS session reuse
 - RE: Expectations for TLS session reuse
 - Expectations for TLS session reuse
 - Re: COPY: "Duplicate" functionality
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
 - Re: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable
 
Thursday, 8 December 2016
- RE: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable
 - Re: rs parameter in encrypted content coding
 - rs parameter in encrypted content coding
 - Re: How to handle content-encoding
 - Re: Call for Adoption: Expect-CT
 - Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
 - Re: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable
 - Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
 - RE: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable
 - Re: Call for Adoption: Expect-CT
 - Re: Call for Adoption: Expect-CT
 - Call for Adoption: Expect-CT
 - Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable
 - Call for Adoption: Early Hints (103)
 
Wednesday, 7 December 2016
Tuesday, 6 December 2016
Monday, 5 December 2016
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: A question about RFC7232#2.2.2
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 
Sunday, 4 December 2016
Saturday, 3 December 2016
Friday, 2 December 2016
- Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - A question about RFC7232#2.2.2
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: HTTP/2 examples SHOULD use :authority
 
Thursday, 1 December 2016
- Re: HTTP/2 examples SHOULD use :authority
 - Re: HTTP/2 examples SHOULD use :authority
 - Re: HTTP/2 examples SHOULD use :authority
 - Re: HTTP/2 examples SHOULD use :authority
 - HTTP/2 examples SHOULD use :authority
 - 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: Question about resource and representation
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 
Wednesday, 30 November 2016
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: Additional comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
 - Re: Early Hints (103)
 - RE: Early Hints (103)
 - RE: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - RE: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: Question about prioritization state management
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
 
Tuesday, 29 November 2016
Wednesday, 30 November 2016
Tuesday, 29 November 2016
Monday, 28 November 2016
- Re: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
 - Re: [expect-ct] Is expect-ct policy intended for long-term use? (plus: no user recourse)
 - Re: Live Byte Ranges
 - Re: Live Byte Ranges
 
Sunday, 27 November 2016
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 
Saturday, 26 November 2016
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
 - Re: [expect-ct] Is expect-ct policy intended for long-term use? (plus: no user recourse)
 
Friday, 25 November 2016
- Re: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
 - Re: RIP: Crypto-Key header field
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - CT-Policy (was: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: Early Hints (103)
 - [expect-ct] Is expect-ct policy intended for long-term use? (plus: no user recourse)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
 - Re: CT-Policy (was: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
 - Re: RIP: Crypto-Key header field
 
Thursday, 24 November 2016
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: Early Hints (103)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
 - Re: CT-Policy (was: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
 - Re: Early Hints (103)
 - Re: RIP: Crypto-Key header field
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
 - Re: CT-Policy (was: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00)
 - Re: CT-Policy (was: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00)
 - Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-wide-headers-01.txt
 - Re: Early Hints (103)
 - Re: CT-Policy (was: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00)
 - Re: [expect-ct] Is expect-ct policy intended for long-term use? (plus: no user recourse)
 - Additional comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
 - [expect-ct] Is expect-ct policy intended for long-term use? (plus: no user recourse)
 - Re: CT-Policy (was: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00)
 
Wednesday, 23 November 2016
- Re: RIP: Crypto-Key header field
 - Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
 - Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
 - Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
 - Re: Early Hints (103)
 - Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
 - Re: Live Byte Ranges
 - Re: Early Hints (103)
 - Re: Early Hints (103)
 - Re: Live Byte Ranges
 - Re: RIP: Crypto-Key header field
 - Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
 - Re: RIP: Crypto-Key header field
 - Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
 - Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
 - Re: RIP: Crypto-Key header field
 
Tuesday, 22 November 2016
- Live Byte Ranges
 - Early Hints (103)
 - Re: Via header specification bug
 - Via header specification bug
 - Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
 - Re: RIP: Crypto-Key header field
 - Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
 - Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: Mixed schemes
 
Monday, 21 November 2016
- Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
 - Re: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
 - Re: Mixed schemes
 - Re: Client hints: Add support for hinting Display Gamut / Color Profile
 - Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
 - Re: Client hints: Add support for hinting Display Gamut / Color Profile
 - Re: RIP: Crypto-Key header field
 - RIP: Crypto-Key header field
 - Re: Question about resource and representation
 - Re: Client hints: Add support for hinting Display Gamut / Color Profile
 - Re: ORIGIN Frame document
 - Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications
 - Re: Mixed schemes
 - Mixed schemes
 - ORIGIN Frame document
 - JFV and Common Structure specifications
 
Sunday, 20 November 2016
Friday, 18 November 2016
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Rough minutes for IETF97
 
Thursday, 17 November 2016
- Re: RFC 5987bis WG last call - naming the encoding
 - Re: RFC 5987bis WG last call - naming the encoding
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
 - Re: RFC 5987bis WG last call - naming the encoding
 - Re: RFC 5987bis WG last call - naming the encoding
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
 - RFC 5987bis WG last call - naming the encoding
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
 
Wednesday, 16 November 2016
Tuesday, 15 November 2016
- Re: rfc5987bis and common structure | Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00.txt (fwd)
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 - Re: Encryption simplification
 - Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
 - Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
 - Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
 - Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
 - Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
 - Re: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
 - Re: Question about resource and representation
 - Reminder: HTTPbis WG meeting in ~1.75 hours
 - Re: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
 
Monday, 14 November 2016
- Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
 - Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
 - Re: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
 - Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
 - Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
 - Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
 - Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
 - Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - FW: New Version Notification for draft-pratt-httpbis-rand-access-live-00.txt
 - Re: Question about resource and representation
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: Question about resource and representation
 - RE: Question about resource and representation
 - feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
 - Question about resource and representation
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
 
Sunday, 13 November 2016
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
 - Re: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 
Saturday, 12 November 2016
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04
 - Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04
 - Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04
 - Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04
 - Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04
 - Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04
 - Re: Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04
 - Comments on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 
Friday, 11 November 2016
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-01.txt (fwd)
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 
Thursday, 10 November 2016
Tuesday, 8 November 2016
Thursday, 10 November 2016
- Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: Op-sec simplification
 - Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00
 
Tuesday, 8 November 2016
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 
Monday, 7 November 2016
- Re: ID for Immutable
 - RE: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 
Saturday, 5 November 2016
Friday, 4 November 2016
- Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: Op-sec simplification
 - Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: Op-sec simplification
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
 
Thursday, 3 November 2016
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: [dnsoverhttp] Bar BOF in Seoul and Mailing List - DNS over HTTP ideas
 - Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: Op-sec simplification
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - RE: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
 
Wednesday, 2 November 2016
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: Op-sec simplification
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
 - FW: New Version Notification for draft-eriksson-http-resource-map-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - RE: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
 - Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: Op-sec simplification
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: Op-sec simplification
 - Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: Op-sec simplification
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04, "4.1 Encryption of a Response"
 - Re: Op-sec simplification
 - Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: Op-sec simplification
 
Tuesday, 1 November 2016
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - RE: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-vkrasnov-h2-compression-dictionaries-01.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: Op-sec simplification
 - RE: Op-sec simplification
 - RE: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: Op-sec simplification
 - Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04, "4.1 Encryption of a Response"
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: Op-sec simplification
 - Re: Op-sec simplification
 - Re: COPY: "Duplicate" functionality
 - Re: Op-sec simplification
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-digest-01.txt
 - Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: Op-sec simplification
 - FW: New Version Notification for draft-bishop-httpbis-http2-additional-certs-02.txt
 
Monday, 31 October 2016
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-digest-01.txt
 - I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-digest-01.txt
 - I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-04.txt
 - Re: Op-sec simplification
 - RE: Op-sec simplification
 - Re: Op-sec simplification
 - Re: Op-sec simplification
 - Re: Encryption simplification
 - I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-08.txt
 - Re: Op-sec simplification
 - Re: Op-sec simplification
 - RE: Op-sec simplification
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: Encryption simplification
 - Re: COPY: "Duplicate" functionality
 - Re: Encryption simplification
 - COPY: "Duplicate" functionality
 - Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: Encryption simplification
 - Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
 - Re: Encryption simplification
 - Re: Op-sec simplification
 - Re: Encryption simplification
 - Re: Encryption simplification
 - Re: Op-sec simplification
 - Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?
 - Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?
 
Sunday, 30 October 2016
Monday, 31 October 2016
Sunday, 30 October 2016
- Re: Encryption simplification
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: Encryption simplification
 - Re: Encryption simplification
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?
 - Re: Encryption simplification
 - Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?
 - Encryption simplification
 - Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?
 - Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 
Saturday, 29 October 2016
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 
Friday, 28 October 2016
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 
Thursday, 27 October 2016
- Re: ID for Immutable
 - Re: FYI: JSON parsing
 - Re: FYI: JSON parsing
 - Re: FYI: JSON parsing
 - Re: FYI: JSON parsing
 - Re: FYI: JSON parsing
 - Re: FYI: JSON parsing
 - Re: FYI: JSON parsing
 - Re: FYI: JSON parsing
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 - Re: FYI: JSON parsing
 - FYI: JSON parsing
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 - Fwd: [QUIC] First Interim planning -- availability poll
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 
Wednesday, 26 October 2016
- Re: ID for Immutable
 - RE: ID for Immutable
 - Re: ID for Immutable
 - ID for Immutable
 - Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4839)
 
Tuesday, 25 October 2016
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 
Sunday, 23 October 2016
Monday, 24 October 2016
Sunday, 23 October 2016
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4839)
 - Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4838)
 - Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4838)
 
Saturday, 22 October 2016
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4838)
 - Fwd: httpbis - Requested sessions have been scheduled for IETF 97
 
Friday, 21 October 2016
- Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 
Thursday, 20 October 2016
- Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 - Re: Re: Quick review for draft-svirid-websocket2-over-http2 (Was: Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97)
 - Re: Re: Quick review for draft-svirid-websocket2-over-http2 (Was: Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97)
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: Bar BOF in Seoul and Mailing List - DNS over HTTP ideas
 - Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97
 - Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: Re: Quick review for draft-svirid-websocket2-over-http2 (Was: Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97)
 - Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97
 - WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)
 - Re: Quick review for draft-svirid-websocket2-over-http2 (Was: Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97)
 - Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 - Re: Quick review for draft-svirid-websocket2-over-http2 (Was: Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97)
 - Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 - Re: Quick review for draft-svirid-websocket2-over-http2 (Was: Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97)
 - Re: Quick review for draft-svirid-websocket2-over-http2 (Was: Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97)
 
Wednesday, 19 October 2016
- Quick review for draft-svirid-websocket2-over-http2 (Was: Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97)
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 - Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 - Re: Draft HTTPbis Agenda For Seoul IETF 97
 - Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?
 - Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 - Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?
 - Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 - Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 - Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 - Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?
 
Tuesday, 18 October 2016
Monday, 17 October 2016
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - RE: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: HTTP Content-Location header usage
 - Fwd: Multipath TCP at the IETF'97 Hackathon and the httpbis WG
 - Fwd: I-D Action: draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09.txt
 - Re: HTTP Content-Location header usage
 - Re: Http header including if ECMA (Javascript) is on and the version
 
Sunday, 16 October 2016
Saturday, 15 October 2016
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Fwd: Http header including if ECMA (Javascript) is on and the version
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: Working Group Last Call: RFC5987bis
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: WGLC comment on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03, was: Encryption content coding simplification
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: draft-kamp-httpbis-structure | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: Common structure | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 - Re: rfc5987bis and common structure | Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00.txt (fwd)
 - Re: Working Group Last Call: RFC5987bis
 - Re: rfc5987bis and common structure | Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00.txt (fwd)
 - draft-kamp-httpbis-structure | Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: rfc5987bis and common structure | Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00.txt (fwd)
 - rfc5987bis and common structure | Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00.txt (fwd)
 - Re: WGLC comment on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03, was: Encryption content coding simplification
 - Common structure | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 
Friday, 14 October 2016
Thursday, 13 October 2016
Friday, 14 October 2016
- Re: WGLC comment on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03, was: Encryption content coding simplification
 - Re: WGLC comment on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03, was: Encryption content coding simplification
 
Thursday, 13 October 2016
- Re: WGLC comment on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03, was: Encryption content coding simplification
 - RE: WGLC comment on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03, was: Encryption content coding simplification
 - draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03 in Java
 - Re: SETTINGS_WEBSOCKET_CAPABLE | Re: WebSocket2
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-02, "2.2.1 Advertising Support for Client Hints"
 - Re: WebSocket2
 - Re: WebSocket HTTP2
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-02, "2.2.1 Advertising Support for Client Hints"
 - Working Group Last Call: RFC5987bis
 - RE: WebSocket2
 - Re: 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 
Wednesday, 12 October 2016
Thursday, 13 October 2016
- Re: WebSocket2
 - Re: WGLC comment on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03, was: Encryption content coding simplification
 - WGLC comment on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03, was: Encryption content coding simplification
 - Re: SETTINGS_WEBSOCKET_CAPABLE | Re: WebSocket2
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00.txt (fwd)
 - Re: draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00 comments
 - Re: draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00 comments
 - Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00.txt (fwd)
 
Wednesday, 12 October 2016
- Re: HTTP Hackathon at IETF Seoul -- Saturday and Sunday before
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - spacing on lists | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
 
Tuesday, 11 October 2016
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc5987bis-03.txt
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
 - Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 - Re: draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00 comments
 - 2nd Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 - Re: #227: Encoding advice for new headers and parameters
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 - Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
 - I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
 - I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
 
Monday, 10 October 2016
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 - draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00 comments
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 - Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 - I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03.txt
 - Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 
Sunday, 9 October 2016
- Re: 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - 2.2. Interaction with "https" URIs | Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 
Saturday, 8 October 2016
- The Downlink Client Hint | Re: Http header including if ECMA (Javascript) is on and the version
 - Re: Http header including if ECMA (Javascript) is on and the version
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: Http header including if ECMA (Javascript) is on and the version
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 
Friday, 7 October 2016
- [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7230 (4779)
 - [Errata Verified] RFC7230 (4667)
 - [Errata Verified] RFC7230 (4825)
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-02, "2.2.1 Advertising Support for Client Hints"
 - Http header including if ECMA (Javascript) is on and the version
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: WebSocket2
 - Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-02 nits
 - draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-02, "2.2.1 Advertising Support for Client Hints"
 - draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-02, "11. References"
 - Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: Empty but existing resource | Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: Empty but existing resource | Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: Empty but existing resource | Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Empty but existing resource | Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 
Thursday, 6 October 2016
- RE: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next
 - Re: #227: Encoding advice for new headers and parameters
 - Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 
Wednesday, 5 October 2016
- Re: RFC6265bis status
 - Re: RFC6265bis status
 - Re: RFC6265bis status
 - Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - RE: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - RE: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: RFC6265bis status
 - Re: WebSocket2
 - Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00.txt (fwd)
 - Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - SETTINGS_WEBSOCKET_CAPABLE | Re: WebSocket2
 - Re: RFC6265bis status
 - Re: RFC6265bis status
 - Re: WebSocket2
 - SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED | Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-02
 - Re: WebSocket2
 - RFC6265bis status
 - Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-02
 - Re: tunnel | Re: WebSocket2
 
Tuesday, 4 October 2016
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-02.txt
 - RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - tunnel | Re: WebSocket2
 - Opportunistic Security for HTTP
 - Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: WebSocket2
 - Re: WebSocket2
 - Re: site-wide headers
 - Re: site-wide headers
 - Re: #227: Encoding advice for new headers and parameters
 - :method | Re: WebSocket2
 - Re: #227: Encoding advice for new headers and parameters
 - I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
 - Re: #227: Encoding advice for new headers and parameters
 
Monday, 3 October 2016
Sunday, 2 October 2016
- Re: WebSocket2
 - Re: WebSocket2
 - Re: WebSocket2
 - Re: WebSocket2
 - Re: WebSocket2
 - Re: WebSocket2
 - Re: WebSocket2
 - Re: WebSocket2
 - Re: WebSocket2
 - Re: WebSocket2