- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 07:37:24 +0100
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi there, I got some great feedback from one of our chairs who checked how this impacts *his* work on RFC 5988bis (which refers to RFC 5987) -- see <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/267>. One point he makes is that the fact that the parameter encoding doesn't have a proper name (other than "the encoding defined in...") makes it hard to talk about it in other specs. So, given that we're after WGLC: Would people object to naming this thing? This would affect the abstract, the introduction, the title, and maybe some more places. *If* the group is ok with this, would "IPE" (Internationalisation Parameter Encoding") be ok? Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2016 06:38:03 UTC