Separate draft sounds reasonable to me too. On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > On 2016-11-21 04:54, Mark Nottingham wrote: > >> Hi Gunther, >> >> Thanks for bringing it up. >> >> What do people think about this? Note the discussion on the issue Gunther >> raised: >> https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/263 >> >> My .02 -- If we're not sure that we can get this into the spec quickly, >> it may make more sense to do it as a separate draft. It doesn't need to be >> in the same draft as CH; putting the headers you see there together was >> only for convenience. >> >> Cheers, >> > > +1 for not including at this point. > > Best regards, Julian > > >
Received on Monday, 21 November 2016 19:11:47 UTC