- From: Benedikt Christoph Wolters <benedikt.wolters@rwth-aachen.de>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:34:22 +0100
- To: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
- CC: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, Roberto Peon <fenix@google.com>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
2016-11-30 14:05 GMT+01:00 Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>: > blocked streams do not distribute their weight to their dependants Blocked streams do, if you apply the 'immediate neighbors' definition in a graph-theoretical sense. Note that there is a difference between neighbors and siblings. So with this in mind, I think the example under subject of this errata is fine as it was before.
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2016 13:35:33 UTC