- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:45:37 +0900
- To: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- CC: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@varnish-cache.org>
On 2016/12/14 06:42, Ilari Liusvaara wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:28:47PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> -------- >> In message <20161213173327.C1F7D1714B@welho-filter2.welho.com>, Kari Hurtta wri >> tes: >>> What is range of unicode_codepoint ? >> >> As far as I know, UNICODE does not have a firm upper end, but >> everybody _expects_ 32 bits to be enough for everybody. > > Actually, it does: 10FFFD is the last codepoint in Unicode (it is > actually allocated as part of PUA). > > IIRC, Unicode has exactly 1,111,998 codepoints in total (most of those > are unallocated). Yes. And Unicode never had more (at some time, it had less). ISO-10646 at one time had a 32-bit architecture, but that was fixed quite a while (~10 years?) ago. It is now also the same as Unicode. Regards, Martin.
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2016 07:46:26 UTC