- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 20:54:13 +1100
- To: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
- Cc: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 7 October 2016 at 18:45, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> wrote: > I think either the 200 or the json are acceptable here - let's decide. Me too. I think that we all now understand the parameters and we have a decent chance of being able to document the hazards, so let's pick. Shall I get a coin?
Received on Friday, 7 October 2016 09:54:41 UTC