- From: Benedikt Christoph Wolters <benedikt.wolters@rwth-aachen.de>
- Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 01:56:05 +0100
- To: Michael Lee <michael.lee@zerustech.com>, <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
2016-12-04 0:42 GMT+01:00 Michael Lee <michael.lee@zerustech.com>: > I don't understand why under the circumstance above, at least one of those responses would have a Date value equal to its Last-Modified time. Strictly speaking I assume the sentence might be slightly wrong. What might have been meant here is a scenario where two responses were send in the same second with identical Last-Modified values and at at least one Date value that is identical to the Last-Modified values. > And what's the point of ensuring a 60 seconds gap between the Last-Modified > time and Date? If the Date and Last-Modified headers are within 60 seconds, it is considered a weak validator, due to potential timing inconsistencies between the Last-Modified clock and Date clock.
Received on Sunday, 4 December 2016 00:57:12 UTC