- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 19:42:17 +0100
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Manger, James H" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>
On 2016-12-08 19:29, Martin Thomson wrote: > James opened this: > > https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/274 > > I'm close to pushing a new version based on what we discussed at the > meeting. This would seem to be an open issue. Here are the choices: > > 1. what we have now, rs = record without authentication tag > 2. what James suggests rs includes auth tag > 3. something else > > My original hope was to avoid having any potential values that were > invalid, but we already got there with padding (rs=0,1,2 are all > invalid). > > Personally, I don't find the lack of generality to be problematic, but > I agree that the choice is a little arbitrary. I'd be interested in > hearing what other people think. I don't feel strongly about it, but I think James' argument is good. So +1 on 2. Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 8 December 2016 18:43:09 UTC