- From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:02:29 -0500
- To: Jacob Champion <champion.p@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 2 December 2016 18:03:29 UTC
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Jacob Champion <champion.p@gmail.com> wrote: > so that existing clients of WS subprotocol you had me at subprotocol. which one(s)? Pointers to definitions? It would be interesting to see how well that mechanism took off - mostly I've seen it used for versioning. but secondarily, sub-protocol negotiation is part of the js api so I probably need a little clarification about what you have in mind as the gap you objected to wrt subprotocol. Thanks.
Received on Friday, 2 December 2016 18:03:29 UTC