Re: 6455 Websockets and the relationship to HTTP

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Jacob Champion <champion.p@gmail.com>
wrote:

> so that existing clients of WS subprotocol



you had me at subprotocol.

which one(s)? Pointers to definitions? It would be interesting to see how
well that mechanism took off - mostly I've seen it used for versioning.

but secondarily, sub-protocol negotiation is part of the js api so I
probably need a little clarification about what you have in mind as the gap
you objected to wrt subprotocol. Thanks.

Received on Friday, 2 December 2016 18:03:29 UTC