- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 14:01:58 +1100
- To: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com>
- Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> On 6 Dec. 2016, at 11:02 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > > On 2016-12-05 09:29, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> -------- >> In message <e90e3aa8-9e53-f077-f6ab-7c7fc50e0061@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes >> : >> >>>>>>> Title : HTTP Client Hints >>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>> Save-Data = sd-token *( OWS ";" OWS [sd-token] ) >>>>>>> sd-token = token >>>>>> >>>>>> Why isn't this list separated by "," like we usually do ? >>>>> >>>>> It's consistent with other client hints which do not use list syntax... >>>>> That said, the prose should state like for the other hints... >>>> >>>> It may be consistent, but it is a good idea, if we want to make life >>>> simpler down the road ? >>> >>> No opinion on that right now; just explaining how the draft likely got >>> there. >> >> Ok. >> >> I'd like to suggest that we make these two (?) drafts conform to >> common structure, by making the lists comma separated. > > In general, if we are serious about common structure, we ought to. Personally, I tend to agree. Ilya, will changing "save-data" to being comma-delimited cause great pain for implementation and deployment? Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 9 December 2016 03:02:34 UTC