Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?

On 2016-10-30 10:21, Samuel Williams wrote:
> Just as a follow up, I've been using other examples on that page as
> part of the unit tests.
> However, I am finding it hard to understand the final table:
> The media type quality factor associated with a given type is
> determined by finding the media range with the highest precedence that
> matches the type. For example,
>   Accept: text/*;q=0.3, text/html;q=0.7, text/html;level=1,
>           text/html;level=2;q=0.4, */*;q=0.5
> would cause the following values to be associated:
> Media Type Quality Value
> text/html;level=1 q=1
> text/html q=0.7
> text/plain q=0.3
> image/jpeg q=0.5
> text/html;level=2 q=0.4
> text/html;level=3 q=0.7
> But I fail to see, for example, where image/jpeg comes from or, say,
> text/html;level=3 because they aren't listed in the given Accept:
> header. Is this a documentation bug?

"image/jpeg" is covered by "*/*;q=0.5"; "text/html;level=3" is covered 
by "text/html;q=0.7".

Best regards, Julian

Received on Sunday, 30 October 2016 10:26:01 UTC