- From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 08:16:09 -0600
- To: Volodymyr Matvienko <aml.wo.m@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2016 14:16:57 UTC
Hi - thanks for writing. At this stage I would suggest the best path would be to participate in the discussions already happening on list and doing your best to relate them to the individual drafts in this space. Even summarizing areas of agreement and controversy is a useful contribution to help focus the conversation and of course experience with code around proposals is always a powerful comment. When we meet at the next IETF in november we will make websockets part of the discussion - to try and get a sense of whether people want to adopt that as a working group task going forward. There has been mild interest in the past, but it does seem to be gaining significant interest lately. You can participate in that remotely via meetecho or in person, and of course actual determinations would be made via mailing list not as part of the meeting. hth -Patrick On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Volodymyr Matvienko <aml.wo.m@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, I working on my high performance server that operating on http/2 > layer and I really need support of such things like xhr or websocket over > http/2. > > I'm developer, I can think and my hands grow from the right place. > > How can I help you to do faster standards for ws over http/2? >
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2016 14:16:57 UTC