- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:01:15 +0000
- To: Matt Menke <mmenke@google.com>
- cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- In message <CAEK7mvr_RWR6RbeXE47Ap4Vh21anu5mHTqaxbwtTmA1ZLQ1dmQ@mail.gmail.com> , Matt Menke writes: >> It's not clear to me what you consider a "hard failure" here ? >> >> In my world this would be 400 like semantics, which I would consider >> a "hard failure" ? >> > >If we treat it more like a network error, we'll show a >browser-generated error page, we don't set cookies, and ignore the response >body entirely. Just to make sure I understand, if you received a HTTP/1 response of "ABCD GOAWAY\r\n\r\n" would that be a "network error" in your terminology ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 17 October 2016 21:01:41 UTC