Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt

On Nov 2, 2016, at 3:50 PM, Roy T. Fielding <> wrote:
> Thanks for the information.  FTR, 100 and 101 were originally defined.
> 102 was an extension.  There have been several attempts to define a 103
> for various reasons, but they were deemed close enough to 102 that they
> were not worth pursuing further.  There are also many uses of 1xx status
> codes within non-standard systems for which no registration was necessary,
> mostly for the sake of hinting at optional features or local status.

Speaking of which, I did a search and found

based on the use of 103 for Google Gears resumable HTTP file uploader
proposal (now lost in the bit vortex that was google code).

I think it is safe to reuse 103 (since we already reused 308), but just
something to keep in mind.  Or, feel free to skip to 104.


Received on Thursday, 3 November 2016 19:41:57 UTC