Re: rfc5987bis and common structure | Re: New Version Notification for draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00.txt (fwd)

In message <>, Kari Hurtta writes

>Headers which may use rfc5987bis are then "uncommon structure".

I think rfc5987 is a bad idea, and it is one of my motivations for
pushing for Common Structure.

>"Content-Disposition" and "Link" are not mentioned
>on draft-kamp-httpbis-structure.

No, I only surveyed RFC723x.

>Someone may think that "Content-Disposition"
>is "common structure":

Which is why I propose to add a field to the IANA registry so there
will be a definitive answer, rather than everybody having to guess.

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

Received on Saturday, 15 October 2016 08:29:50 UTC