- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 08:29:24 +0000
- To: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
- cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- In message <201610150820.u9F8KlU6025186@shell.siilo.fmi.fi>, Kari Hurtta writes : >Headers which may use rfc5987bis are then "uncommon structure". I think rfc5987 is a bad idea, and it is one of my motivations for pushing for Common Structure. >"Content-Disposition" and "Link" are not mentioned >on draft-kamp-httpbis-structure. No, I only surveyed RFC723x. >Someone may think that "Content-Disposition" >is "common structure": Which is why I propose to add a field to the IANA registry so there will be a definitive answer, rather than everybody having to guess. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Saturday, 15 October 2016 08:29:50 UTC